Ancell, D (2005) Reducing costs: A practical application of performance-based specification and transaction cost theories. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2005, London, UK.
Abstract
Companies rarely examine the hidden costs of transactions. However, testing the appropriate transaction cost and performance-based specification (PBS) theories in a commercial environment can show real cost savings which could be delivered from appropriate process changes. The documentation from two completed projects was counted and grouped with a view to using them as a proxy for the volume of transactions in the projects, to examine the efficiency of the existing procurement route and to allocate a cost to the "administration" documentation. Analysis of the documentation using three different groupings showed that "administration" transactions were approximately 35% higher than the client anticipated - and that some ex ante and ex post costs (including enforcement) were not included. The client insisted that the outsourced Project Manager (PM) used the client's prescriptive-based suppliers. Consequently, the PM had less information on the sub-contractors than the client which gave rise to "asymmetrical information". This challenged the rationale of only partially-outsourcing the project management functions and also the client's muddled approach to the issue of using "market or hierarchy" for non-core commercial functions. Had PBS been used for these projects; there would have been a saving of approximately £114k of a total of £200k spend.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asymmetrical information; hierarchy; market; performance based specifications; transaction costs |
| Index terms: | outsourcing, documentation, performance-based specification, enforcement, testing, process change, cost saving, project management, efficiency, transaction cost, sub-contractor, project manager |
| Subjects: | performance management, management, professional development, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, business, project management theory and practice, professional practice, economics, financial analysis, practitioner, profession |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Procurement, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Project Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here