Cai, Q; Hu, Q and Ma, G (2021) Improved hybrid reasoning approach to safety risk perception under uncertainty for mountain tunnel construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(9): 04021105, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Tunnel projects in mountainous areas are considered a kind of high-risk work due to the complexity of geological conditions, as well as the diversity of construction and management factors. Numerous research efforts have been made to estimate the risk level of tunnel collapse by multicriteria decision-making (MCDM) methods considering a variety of risk factors, aiming to provide a decision basis for risk management. However, the uncertainty of fuzziness and randomness existing in evaluation factors gradation are usually neglected. The information fusion method based on extension theory (ET) is an effective tool for uncertain information reasoning. Nevertheless, the potential contribution of each piece of evidence to the fusion result has not been given enough attention. To overcome these deficiencies, this paper presents a novel hybrid reasoning approach to perceive the risk level of mountain tunnel collapse under uncertainty by integrating the extended cloud model (ECM) and improved Dempster-Shafer (D-S) evidence theory at the construction stage. ET and cloud model (CM) are merged to construct the basic probability assignments (BPAs) of the influenceable variables corresponding to different risk states under uncertainty, i.e., the randomness and fuzziness. The overall risk level is derived from a fusion of all the influenceable factors using the improved D-S theory developed in this paper. Specifically, the weight of each piece of evidence is assessed considering its importance to risk perception results and used to improve the evidence source by the discounting method before evidence fusion. Evidence conflicts are resolved through a weighted-average fusion process based on the evidence distance. Besides, a confidence indicator is introduced to assess the reliability of the fusion results. Finally, a case study in Canglongxia Tunnel is employed to verify the validity of the developed approach. The method proposed in this paper has the potential to reduce the deviation of risk assessment results for tunnel collapse in mountain tunnel construction induced by the uncertainty of risk factors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Dempster-Shafer evidence theory; extended cloud model; information fusion; safety risk; tunnel collapse; uncertainty analysis |
| Index terms: | case study, risk assessment, tunnel construction, risk factor, tunnel, reasoning, validity, risk management, complexity, decision-making, evidence, estimate, risk perception, deviation, uncertainty analysis |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, decision analysis, data collection methods, risk assessment, systems engineering, cognitive psychology, civil engineering, financial risk, environmental hazards, financial and cost management, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here