Castelblanco, G; Guevara, J; Mesa, H and Sanchez, A (2021) Semantic network analysis of literature on public-private partnerships. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5): 02041, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have motivated diverse bibliometric analyses of PPP research. Nevertheless, the evolution and connections between the main topics in the PPP domain have not been explored. To improve the understanding of the PPP research agenda, this study uses Content Analysis (CA) and Semantic Network Analysis (SNA) to expose relationships and trends in PPP research topics over the last two decades. These methodologies helped researchers to move beyond analyzing thematic trends in isolation in order to gain insight into the interrelationships among PPP topics by using qualitative and quantitative tools, which is difficult to achieve with other methodological approaches. The SNA metrics showed that the PPP research agenda evolved into a high-clustered network driven by five macrokeywords: financing and economic aspects, road infrastructure, public sector management, risk management, and contract management. These macrokeywords may enable the growth of the entire PPP research agenda, but they could also jeopardize the emergence of new research trends. Results show that the participation of some traditional PPP infrastructure types, such as power generation, rail, and tunnel, has been reduced, in contrast to more recent types such as healthcare and, especially, airport infrastructure. Similarly, research focus has shifted from examining traditional PPP issues in the US and European Union to analyzing PPP development in Africa, Latin America, and Asia. Overall, this study presents a more holistic understanding of the PPP body of knowledge, its evolution, and the interaction of its main topics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | content analysis; public-private partnerships; semantic network analysis; social network analysis |
| Index terms: | European Union, public sector, partnership, Africa, network analysis, power generation, interaction, risk management, bibliometric analysis, content analysis, social network analysis, tunnel, contract management, research agenda, emergence, financing, body of knowledge, methodology, Asia, evolution |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, regions and continents, knowledge management, data analysis and analytics, environmental science, energy systems, risk assessment, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, administrative law, infrastructure and transport systems, research management, partnership management, research evaluation and metrics, contract management, research methods, physical geography and landforms |
| Topics: | Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Legal Issues, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here