Dust emissions management model for construction sites

Clement, D; Aliabadi, A A; MacKey, J; Thé, J and Gharabaghi, B (2021) Dust emissions management model for construction sites. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(8): 04021092, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Fugitive dust emissions from active construction sites, without wind erosion and dust suppression controls, can be orders of magnitude higher than predevelopment background values. As the exact location, size, and timing of construction activities within a region are difficult to forecast, a new probabilistic dust emission management tool is proposed to understand better and control the factors influencing dust emissions on construction sites. The proposed construction-induced dust emission management (CIDEM) probabilistic model incorporates both the spatial and temporal variation of construction activities. A characterization of the construction phases provides the basis for more accurate dust emission calculations allowing cost-savings in the selection/sizing of the wind erosion and dust suppression control measures commonly used on construction sites, including watering, mulching, chemical dust suppressants, and revegetation. A best management practices (BMPs) cost-optimization is performed using a genetic algorithm to consider multiple nonlinear influencing factors. The benefits of this new CIDEM methodology were demonstrated on its application on the Lake Simcoe region, in Canada, including generating possible management policy statements based on dust emission risk assessment for issuing building permits for different site conditions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: air quality; construction sites; fugitive dust; lake simcoe; pm 10
Index terms: temporal variation, management practice, methodology, construction site, genetic algorithm, construction phase, risk assessment, air quality, construction activity, Canada, savings, influencing factor
Subjects: project controls, Geography, financial risk, management, research methods, algorithms, construction operations, economic analysis, project delivery, work location, climate science, risk assessment
Topics: Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Risk Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here