Dias Barkokebas, R and Li, X (2021) Use of virtual reality to assess the ergonomic risk of industrialized construction tasks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(3): 04020183, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Workers in industrialized construction are often exposed to physical demands (e.g., repetitive motion and awkward body posture) associated with the risks of work-related musculoskeletal disorders, despite the utilization of automated equipment. To reduce exposure to these risks, an investigation of workstation design is needed. This paper proposes a virtual reality (VR)-based ergonomic assessment method that identifies ergonomic risk ratings proactively in the initial phases of workstation design, thus reducing the need for physical mock-ups and lessening the cost and time required to develop and implement an improved workstation design. This method was demonstrated in an operational task through an experiment conducted with 13 participants. Compared with the physical mock-up, the designed VR application achieved an accuracy of approximately 86% and 80%, respectively, in Rapid Upper Limb Assessment and Rapid Entire Body Assessment to assess risk. Moreover, a questionnaire was developed to obtain feedback from participants on their perceptions toward the designed VR application, which further supported the success of using the proposed VR-based ergonomic assessment method.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | ergonomic risk assessment; industrialized construction; rapid entire body assessment; rapid upper limb assessment; virtual reality |
| Index terms: | accuracy, experiment, exposure, industrialized construction, questionnaire, virtual reality, risk assessment, investigation |
| Subjects: | public and environmental health, financial risk, professional development, construction type, data collection methods, virtual reality |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Construction Technology |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here