Ernstsen, S N; Whyte, J; Thuesen, C and Maier, A (2021) How innovation champions frame the future: Three visions for digital transformation of construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(1): 1928, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Digital technologies are expected to create transformational change in the construction sector. Previous studies have either anticipated the impact of individual technologies or outlined a number of nontechnology-focused future scenarios. There is comparatively little work on how innovation champions frame the future by combining a range of digital technologies and trends (such as big data, the internet of things, and automation) to transform construction. Drawing on an interview-based study with UK construction professionals, this paper presents three emergent visions for digital transformation of the sector. These visions are efficient construction, user-data-driven built environment, and value-driven computational design. Arising in practitioner narratives, these visions all emphasize different technologies and are partially influenced, intertwined, and interconnected with technology, business, and policy discourses in the sector. Furthermore, the visions represent different trajectories for implementing digital technologies in the construction sector. This paper contributes to work on construction foresight and innovation discourses by articulating the multiplicity of visions for digital transformation of construction. This has implications for researchers, practitioners, and policy makers responsible for the digital transformation of construction toward possible, profitable, and desirable futures.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | narrative, practitioner, digital technology, construction sector, interview, big data, drawing, construction professional, built environment, automation, internet, transformation |
| Subjects: | business, data collection methods, computing systems, practitioner, technical documentation, professional development, qualitative and interpretive research, automation and robotics, information systems, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here