Automation of inspection mission planning using 4D bims and in support of unmanned aerial vehicle-based data collection

Hamledari, H; Sajedi, S; McCabe, B and Fischer, M (2021) Automation of inspection mission planning using 4D bims and in support of unmanned aerial vehicle-based data collection. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(3): 4020179, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The data collected by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) provide unique opportunities for applications, such as construction progress tracking and facility monitoring. To increase the effectiveness of UAV-captured data, inspection mission plans should be designed prior to site visits. The data collection locations must be identified and adjusted based on the user's objectives. The UAV flight mission must guarantee a visit to each identified location, and the inspection plans must satisfy the constraints imposed by safety requirements, no-fly zones, and UAV's limited battery life. This problem becomes more complicated indoors due to complex and continuously changing building layouts. This work uses four-dimensional (4D) building information models (BIM) to automatically design optimal UAV mission plans in support of indoor UAV-enabled data acquisition. It automatically identifies the inspection targets based on users' customizable and multicriteria description of objectives (e.g., columns behind schedule). The three-dimensional (3D) navigable space is automatically calculated by time stamping the 4D models based on the inspection date. The navigable space is further refined based on safety rules. An optimal UAV inspection mission plan is developed using swarm intelligence that ensures complete coverage of targets and minimizes battery use. The method is based on the industry foundation classes (IFC) schema, promoting OpenBIM and interoperability, which are core challenges in the construction information modeling domain.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: automation, unmanned aerial vehicle, interoperability, data acquisition, monitoring, industry foundation classes, effectiveness, information modelling, inspection, swarm intelligence, column, construction progress tracking, guarantee
Subjects: quality assurance, systems and processes, digital design, automation and robotics, performance management, structural engineering, contract structure, analytical methods, control systems, data collection methods, computational design
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here