Huang, H; Zhang, C and Hammad, A (2021) Effective scanning range estimation for using tls in construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(9): 04021106, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The terrestrial laser scanner (TLS) is an effective tool to generate geometric models of existing buildings and other structures. TLS has shown great potential in the architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) industry. High standards for accuracy and density of point clouds are essential for producing accurate models. Some requirements have been developed for evaluating the deliverability of collected point clouds. However, practical guidelines for collecting qualified data may not always be available in every scenario. Consequently, either over-dense point clouds are collected to cover as large a range as possible, a conservative approach that results in wasted time in data collection and processing, or sparse point clouds are collected to reduce data collection time, which results in missing data. The present work proposes a methodology to calculate the effective scan range based on rigorous mathematical reasoning with straightforward equations considering all the neighboring points on the target plane. Using the proposed workflow, appropriate angular resolution can be quickly estimated to balance the scanning range and the collected data size in site surveying. Two case studies were carried out to investigate the feasibility of the proposed methodology. The results show that the point clouds within the suggested effective scanning range are highly consistent with expectations, which indicates that the proposed methodology is feasible and reliable.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | effective scanning range; point clouds; practical workflow; terrestrial laser scanner |
| Index terms: | estimation, density, case study, resolution, point cloud, accuracy, reasoning, surveying, workflow, construction project, methodology |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, financial and cost management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, data collection methods, conflict resolution, cognitive psychology, production management, professional development, digital design, management, research methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here