Low-high orthoimage pairs-based 3D reconstruction for elevation determination using drone

Jiang, Y and Bai, Y (2021) Low-high orthoimage pairs-based 3D reconstruction for elevation determination using drone. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(9): 04021097, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper presents a 3D reconstruction method for fast elevation determination on construction sites. The proposed method is intended to automatically and accurately determine construction site elevations using drone-based, low-high orthoimage pairs. This method requires fewer images than other methods for covering a large target area of a construction site. An up-forward-down path was designed to capture approximately 2:1-scale images at different altitudes over target stations. A pixel grid matching and elevation determination algorithm was developed to automatically match images in dense pixel grid-style via self-adaptive patch feature descriptors, and simultaneously determine elevations based on a virtual elevation model. The 3D reconstruction results were an elevation map and an orthoimage at each station. Then, the large-scale results of the entire site were easily stitched from adjacent results with narrow overlaps. Moreover, results alignment was automatically performed via the U-net detected ground control point. Experiments validated that in 10-20 and 20-40 orthoimage pairs, 92% of 2,500- and 4,761-pixels were matched in the strongest and strong levels, which was better than sparse reconstructions via structure from motion; moreover, the elevation measurements were as accurate as photogrammetry using multiscale overlapping images.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 3D reconstruction; construction site; drone; elevation algorithm; pixel matching
Index terms: drone, experiment, reconstruction, construction site
Subjects: automation and robotics, work location, building construction, data collection methods
Topics: Site Management, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here