Effectiveness of serious games for safety training: A mixed method study

Kazar, G and Comu, S (2021) Effectiveness of serious games for safety training: A mixed method study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(8): 04021091, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Effective safety training is essential to reduce the number of construction accidents caused by unsafe human actions. The application of serious games in construction safety is growing rapidly because serious games offer an interactive and innovative environment for delivering safety training. Thus, evaluating the effectiveness of such safety training tools is indispensable. However, most of the studies that introduce serious game-based safety training use qualitative methods for validation. Therefore, a gap in the literature exists in verifying the effectiveness of serious games by using empirical methods. In this study, we examine the effectiveness of serious games by using various methods such as paper-based assessment and degree of recall. For this purpose, we conducted experiments with a total of 42 senior civil engineering students. According to the mixed ANOVA results, students significantly increased their occupational safety knowledge compared to traditional training after receiving serious game-based safety training. The results also show that serious game-based training provides effective training that ensures the maintenance of safety knowledge acquired over time. Moreover, the game experience levels of the participants did not influence their safety training performance.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: mixed anova; serious games; training effectiveness; virtual safety training
Index terms: training effectivenes, construction safety, validation, construction accident, qualitative method, experiment, occupational safety, safety training, effectiveness, mixed method
Subjects: research design and methodology, data collection methods, assessment methods, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, performance management, professional development
Topics: Quality Management, Education, Research Practice, Information Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here