Kim, H and Ham, Y (2021) Increasing reliability of participatory sensing for utility pole condition assessment using fuzzy inference. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(1): 0001968, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Aging infrastructure has become a safety issue for local communities. For example, aging and deteriorating utility poles in strong winds have a high risk of falling onto roads, adjacent houses, or vehicles, which could cause traffic jams, power outages, property damage, or casualties. To prevent such accidents, the infrastructure condition needs to be monitored on a regular basis, thereby facilitating proactive maintenance and repair. However, available monitoring resources are limited for inspecting numerous existing infrastructures in a timely manner, which hinders obtaining up-to-date records representing the current condition status. As an alternative monitoring method, participatory sensing has the potential for infrastructure inspection, leveraging the prevalence of citizens' smartphones as a ubiquitous sensing device. Nonetheless, the reliability of crowdsourced data for infrastructure monitoring and how to improve it have not been investigated fully, although participatory sensing increasingly has been adopted in many studies. Because citizens generally do not have expertise in infrastructure condition assessment, a lack of understanding of the crowdsourced data reliability prevents participatory sensing from being implemented in practice. To advance the understanding of the crowdsourced data reliability for infrastructure assessment, this study investigated the discrepancy in infrastructure assessment results by citizens and by an expert. Wood utility poles were selected as a target infrastructure. This study investigated a way to reduce the deviation between the expert's and the citizens' responses through a fuzzy inference system along with particle swarm optimization and pattern search algorithms. The experimental results showed that the proposed fuzzy inference system reduced the evaluation error by 21.18%. The findings of this study have the potential to fill the knowledge gap for enhancing participatory sensing in infrastructure monitoring, thereby promoting future study to enhance its applicability for citizen-driven urban resilience.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | urban resilience, wood, monitoring, repair, infrastructure assessment, inspection, deviation, fuzzy inference, safety issue, future study |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, decision-making and optimization, sustainability and resilience, traditional and composite building materials, infrastructure engineering, research design and methodology, financial and cost management, maintenance engineering, financial risk, control systems |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Urban Studies, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Construction Materials, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here