Automatic recognition of workers' motions in highway construction by using motion sensors and long short-term memory networks

Kim, K and Cho, Y K (2021) Automatic recognition of workers' motions in highway construction by using motion sensors and long short-term memory networks. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(3): 04020184, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Monitoring and understanding construction workers' behavior and working conditions are essential to achieve success in construction projects. The dynamic nature of construction sites has heightened the awareness of the need for improved monitoring of individual workers on sites. Although several studies indicated promising results in automated motion and activity recognition using wearable motion sensors, their technical and practical feasibility was not properly validated at actual job sites. Motion recognition models have to be evaluated in actual conditions because the motion sensor data collected in controlled conditions, and actual conditions can have different characteristics. This study proposes Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks for recognizing construction workers' motions. The LSTM networks were validated through case studies in one bridge construction site and two road pavement sites. The LSTM networks indicated classification accuracies of 97.6%, 95.93%, and 97.36% from three different field test sites, respectively. Through the case studies, the technical and practical feasibility of the LSTM networks was properly investigated. With LSTM networks, individual workers' behavior and working conditions are expected to be automatically monitored and managed without excessive manual observation.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction worker; deep learning; long short-term memory; monitoring; motion recognition
Index terms: sensor data, controlled conditions, bridge construction, field test, working conditions, accuracy, deep learning, construction worker, construction project, monitoring, case study, highway construction, construction site, activity recognition
Subjects: control systems, research products and data, civil engineering, professional development, artificial intelligence, production management, data collection methods, practitioner, employment law, modelling and simulation, testing methods, infrastructure engineering, work location
Topics: Design Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Site Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here