Impact of value management on building projects success: Structural equation modeling approach

Kineber, A F; Othman, I; Oke, A E; Chileshe, N and Buniya, M K (2021) Impact of value management on building projects success: Structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4): 04021011, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In the last two decades, value management (VM) has become an established construction practice based on fundamental approaches. Implementation of VM activities can contribute to enhancement of the initial objectives in terms of cost, quality, and time. However, the VM activities adopt informal approaches in the Egyptian construction industry. This study aims to develop a VM implementation model by investigating the relationship between VM implementation and the overall project success (OPS) in Egyptian building projects. Fifteen experts were interviewed to assess the VM activities obtained from previous studies. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to validate the results from the interviews. Structured questionnaires completed by building professionals were further employed to investigate the importance of these VM activities. Partial least squared structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to determine and confirm the factors structure and examine the relationships between the VM implementation and OPS. The results showed a moderate association, with the implementation of the VM contributing 55.5% to the success of the project. The findings can be used as a benchmark for decision-makers to minimize costs and boost efficiency by implementing VM in the Egyptian construction industry. This study advances the current construction engineering management by improving the understanding of VM methods and activities.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building projects; Egypt; partial least square; project success; structural equation modeling; value management
Index terms: structural equation modelling, exploratory factor analysis, interview, partial least square, construction engineering management, questionnaire, efficiency, project success, implementation, construction industry, Egypt, building professional, value management
Subjects: contractual arrangements, data collection methods, profession, statistical analysis, industry analysis, project management theory and practice, Geography, performance management, management
Topics: Quality Management, Value Management, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here