King-Lewis, A; Shan, Y and Ivey, M (2021) Gender bias and its impact on self-concept in undergraduate and graduate construction education programs in the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11): 04021155, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Previous studies argued that gender bias has an effect on the retention of female students in male-dominated academic programs. This study examined the prevalence of gender bias in construction education programs from different sources and the impact on students' self-concept. Participants responded to a quantitative survey measuring gender bias, construction education self-concept, supportiveness of peers, and group identity. Results indicated that 87% of female students experienced gender bias in the previous year, which emanated significantly more often from male peers than from female peers, mentors or advisors, or professors. Gender bias had a direct impact on students' self-concept, as did group identity. These findings suggest that interventions attempting to curtail gender bias in construction education programs should focus on male peers as their primary target and professors as a secondary target. Strategies to build group identity likely will improve students' self-concept. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by exploring gender bias in construction degree programs and the impact of these experiences on student's self-concept, and by providing evidence-based recommendations for fostering the inclusion of women in construction-related academic programs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | gender bias; group identity; peer support; self-concept; workforce diversity |
| Index terms: | undergraduate, survey, mentors, strategy, retention, body of knowledge, women, United States, construction education, bias, identity, program, evidence |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, software systems, probability and distributions, management, Geography, data collection methods, curriculum development, practitioner, knowledge management, professional education, sociology |
| Topics: | Information Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Education, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here