Project resource input optimization problem with combined time constraints based on node network diagram and constraint programming

Kong, F; Guo, J and Lv, X (2021) Project resource input optimization problem with combined time constraints based on node network diagram and constraint programming. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(12): 2192, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The traditional resource-constrained project scheduling problem makes the amounts of resource input fixed and ignores the joint effect of multiple time constraints, which may lead to the failure of traditional algorithms. This paper introduces a new practical problem called the resource input optimization problem with combined time constraints (RIOP/CTC), which studies the influence of resource input schemes. The new problem combines three types of time constraints, including precedence relations, resource calendars, and interruptability for the first time, which makes it closer to the actual scheduling problem. We propose a new network diagram called node network diagram and develop an optimization model based on constraint programming (CP) and the technique for order preference by similarity to the ideal solution (TOPSIS). A three-step guideline and an actual project case are provided for schedulers to help them better use the model to solve RIOP/CTC, which also proves the validity of the model. Computational experiments are carried out to show that the CP optimizer is superior to the three common metaheuristic algorithms in solving quality and speed and can provide a near-optimum solution for large-scale scheduling problems in an acceptable time. The proposed model contributes to improving the practical decision system to support the formulation of real-life project resource input schemes, scheduling plans, and employee work plans.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: constraint programming; gprs; interruptability; node network diagram; resource calendar; resource input; topsis
Index terms: validity, topsis, constraint programming, experiment, scheduling, project scheduling, scheduler, preference
Subjects: practitioner, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, operations research, decision-making and reasoning, algorithms, decision-making and optimization, project controls
Topics: Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Time Control, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here