Lee, C Y and Chong, H Y (2021) Influence of prior ties on trust and contract functions for BIM-enabled EPC megaproject performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7): 04021057, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Drawing on transaction cost theory as well as social exchange perspective, this study investigates the influence of prior ties on trust and contract functions - contractual control, coordination, and contingency adaptability - for improving building information modeling (BIM)-enabled engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) megaproject performance. This study compares questionnaire data collected from stakeholders in oil and gas megaprojects with and without prior working relationships and uses partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to analyze the relationship between trust, contract functions, and project performance in prior ties and nonprior ties model. The results reveal that trust influences project performance via contract functions significantly in both models. This study found that parties without a prior working relationship are more willing to rely on contractual control to improve project performance, whereas contracting parties with a prior working relationship are more likely to use contingency adaptability to enhance project performance. The findings of this study expand the theoretical understanding of how the trust engendered from prior ties influences the formation of contract functions to improve the performance of BIM-enabled EPC megaprojects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | contracting party, building information modelling, oil and gas, coordination, project performance, structural equation modelling, drawing, transaction cost, partial least square, megaproject, questionnaire, adaptability |
| Subjects: | user focus, data collection methods, practitioner, technical documentation, strategic project management, management, project management theory and practice, statistical analysis, financial analysis, information systems, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Project Management, Cost Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here