Li, M and Ashuri, B (2021) Proportional cox hazards model to quantify the likelihood of underestimation in transportation projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(10): 04021134, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Preparing accurate cost estimates for highway projects always has been challenging for transportation agencies. It is a common problem that the lowest submitted bid significantly deviates from owner's estimate. This might result in project delay or cancellation, budget pressure, and cost overrun, which are problematic for both owner organizations and highway contractors. There is a need to enhance understanding of transportation agencies about the likelihood of underestimation. This research assessed relations of several potential drivers to explain and forecast the likelihood of underestimation. This research for the first time used concepts and methods from survival analysis and applied them into construction bidding process. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was developed which is capable of examining significance of variables representing characteristics of project, bidder, and external (environmental) market, and using them to predict the likelihood of underestimation in transportation projects. The results showed that number of bidders, number of pay items, total number of projects awarded in the same month at state level, project types, producer price index for construction machinery manufacturing, value of construction put in place for commercial, unemployment, and highly active contractors are significant drivers of likelihood of underestimation. This research contributes to the state of knowledge in construction bidding analysis by identifying drivers of the likelihood of underestimation and creating a Cox model to explain and predict the likelihood of underestimation using information available from the identified drivers. It is anticipated that the results will help transportation agencies better understand the extent of risk of deviation between low bids and owner's estimates, prepare more-accurate cost estimates and budgets, and develop appropriate risk mitigation strategies for successful project delivery.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bidding analysis; Cox regression; owner's estimate; engineer's estimate; survival analysis |
| Index terms: | deviation, cost overrun, engineer, owner, transportation agency, regression model, survival, project delivery, estimate, cost estimate, bidder, highway construction, strategy, transportation project, number of bidders, bidding, project delay, unemployment, risk mitigation |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, transportation engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, project controls, financial risk, civil engineering, management, economic analysis, financial and cost management, project delivery, environmental science, bidding, profession |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here