Human-robot collaboration in construction: Classification and research trends

Liang, C J; Wang, X; Kamat, V R and Menassa, C C (2021) Human-robot collaboration in construction: Classification and research trends. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(10): 03121006, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction robots continue to be increasingly deployed on construction sites to assist human workers in various tasks to improve safety, efficiency, and productivity. Due to the recent and ongoing growth in robot capabilities and functionalities, humans and robots are now able to work side-by-side and to share workspaces. The emerging field of human-robot collaboration has significant potential applications in construction and continues to advance the state of the art in defining the responsibilities of both humans and robots during collaborative work. This paper proposes a new taxonomy for collaborative human-robot work in construction teams. The evolution of construction robots during the last two decades is first reviewed, and relevant bodies of work are categorized into one of five levels of human-robot collaboration: Preprogramming, Adaptive Manipulation, Imitation Learning, Improvisatory Control, and Full Autonomy. The categories of the proposed taxonomy are defined based on the level of robot autonomy and the corresponding human effort in collaborative teamwork. Second, this paper uses the categories of the proposed taxonomy as a contextual framework to identify current challenges and knowledge gaps in collaborative human-robot construction work and recommends directions for future research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptive manipulation; construction robots; full autonomy; human-robot collaboration; imitation learning; improvisatory control; preprogramming
Index terms: state of the art, collaboration, evolution, functionality, construction site, construction work, taxonomy, teamwork, efficiency, construction team, workspace, productivity
Subjects: management, performance management, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, project delivery, operations management, work location, design features, research dissemination and communication
Topics: Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Design Practice, Site Management, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here