Liu, Y; Jarvamardi, A; Zhang, Y; Liu, M; Hsiang, S M; Yang, S; Yu, X and Jiang, Z (2021) Comparative study on perception of causes for construction task delay in China and the United States. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(3): 04020176, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Rapidly growing construction markets in China and the United States have provided opportunities for contractors to venture into foreign industries. To help project managers understand the fundamental difference in culture and the way projects are managed, it is useful and critical to reveal and compare the causes of delay and construction management practices in China and the US. The research is aimed at identifying and comparing the most prevalent reasons for task-level delay between the two countries, as perceived by various levels of management, and understanding how the culture and tradition influence management practice and performance. A questionnaire survey for public projects contracted to civilian construction companies was administered to contractors, 150 usable responses from China were collected, and the results were compared to the results from a similar survey in the US. The contributions are quantitatively examining the essential constituents causing task delay, discovering the root causes and key differences in construction management culture between the two countries, and developing strategies to help contractors minimize possible task delay when working in different culture and environments. The findings will help construction managers learn the essential differences in culture and their impact on the ways of project operation so that they can take proactive actions to interact with project managers from different counties to minimize delays.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; delay; factor analysis; tasks |
| Index terms: | project manager, construction market, comparative study, causes of delay, factor analysis, strategy, construction company, survey, United States, China, management practice, public project, construction manager, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | research design and methodology, organization, profession, data collection methods, market analysis, project controls, statistical analysis, management, infrastructure engineering, Geography |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here