Love, P E D; Matthews, J and Fang, W (2021) Reflections on the risk and uncertainty of rework in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4), ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Rework can be a problem in construction projects. While research has contributed to the accumulation of knowledge about rework, there remains limited understanding about its causal mechanisms. The result is an inability to manage and control the risks and uncertainties that surround rework causation in construction projects. This paper suggests that possessing knowledge and having an understanding of rework causation and its context is pivotal for anticipating its likely occurrence and putting in place risk mitigation strategies. The paper concludes by suggesting there is a need to develop a knowledge engineering system to capture rework in projects so that artificial intelligence can be used to support uncertainty management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; knowledge; rework; risk; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | uncertainty management, reflection, artificial intelligence, construction project, risk mitigation, strategy, rework |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, financial risk, management, professional development, production management, operations management, artificial intelligence |
| Topics: | Information Management, Project Management, Cost Management, Digital Applications, Risk Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here