Ma, G; Jia, J; Ding, J; Wu, M and Wang, D (2021) Examining the impact of social media use on project management performance: Evidence from construction projects in China. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(3): 04021004, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Team members in construction projects often fail to communicate effectively, share knowledge, and coordinate as a whole. Although many construction organizations have adopted social media technologies to improve project team processes, little is known about how social media use at work affects project team processes and project management performance. Against this background, employing the enabler-process-intermediate outcome-performance framework, this paper aims to explore the mechanism by which social media use at work affects project management performance with a specific focus on project team processes and project team efficacy. Based on literature research and theoretical analysis, the theoretical model with several research hypotheses is formulated. The empirical data are collected from 156 construction project managers, and the structural equation modeling technique is applied to test the theoretical model. The results show that social media use at work positively influences three team processes, specifically, effective communication, knowledge sharing, and coordination. The three project team processes then indicate different effects on project team efficacy. Furthermore, the project team processes enhance project management performance through project team efficacy. These empirical results reveal the benefits of social media use at work in construction project teams and provide valuable implications for practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction projects; project management performance; project team; social media use at work |
| Index terms: | construction project team, construction organization, social media, coordination, project management, project team, manager, knowledge sharing, structural equation modelling, evidence, construction project, China |
| Subjects: | management, production management, Geography, project management theory and practice, statistical analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, organization, practitioner, technology adoption, knowledge management, project delivery |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Information Management, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here