Martin, H and Ramjarrie, K (2021) Cloud contractor selection model for design-build open tender. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4): 04021020, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
For transparency and accountability, public sector clients typically select a contractor using lowest-price open tendering. This paper focuses on improving the selection of a design-build contractor by modeling the inherent uncertainties associated with open tendering. Although there are numerous methods for selecting a contractor, few consider, and even fewer have accounted for, random uncertainties associated with open tendering. In the absence of a structured approach that includes cognitive uncertainty modeling, the risk of choosing a subpar contractor and consequent project failure increases. Cloud theory uses a normal distribution membership function to infuse fuzzy set theory with probability theory. The application of cloud theory in a case study to order the preferred contractors improves decision-making quality and, consequently, confidence in the derived outcome where uncertainty exists. By accounting for both fuzzy and random uncertainties expressed by decision makers, this formulation for contractor selection increases the potential to achieve client performance goals. The proposed new approach reduces the risk of project failure by offering a unique understanding of how to more efficiently choose a design-build contractor. It narrows the model prediction and practice gap by providing an alternative to selecting the lowest bidder.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | cloud computing; decision theory; expert system; fuzzy set; multicriteria; uncertainty |
| Index terms: | uncertainty modelling, decision theory, accounting, expert system, decision-making, accountability, public-sector client, cloud computing, transparency, modelling, design-build contractor, bidder, fuzzy set theory, fuzzy set, project failure, case study, contractor selection |
| Subjects: | data management, decision analysis, sociology, decision-making and optimization, environmental hazards, liability law, digital infrastructure, tendering, professional development, bidding, analytical methods, economic analysis, data collection methods, project completion, practitioner |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Project Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here