Utilization of prior information in neural network training for improving 28-day concrete strength prediction

Moon, S and Munira Chowdhury, A (2021) Utilization of prior information in neural network training for improving 28-day concrete strength prediction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5): 2047, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

A concrete mix design aims to obtain the optimal proportions of concrete ingredients, including cement, water, sand, coarse aggregates, and admixtures. Neural networks (NNs) have been widely applied in research to predict concrete strength, and the concrete ingredients and concrete strength metrics have been used as the input and output parameters, respectively. The objective of this study is to use the 3-day concrete strength as the prior information in the NN training to reduce overfitting and improve the 28-day concrete strength prediction capability. This study is unique because the 3-day concrete strength was not used as another input parameter in the NN training; instead, it was used as data for the initial weights and biases of the connection node in the hidden layer during the NN training. Accordingly, a prior information-based NN model (PI-NNM) was developed to obtain a 28-day concrete strength prediction model. According to the tests with data subsets, the PI-NNM showed a better prediction capability than the conventional NN model, which uses only input parameters for the concrete prediction. Moreover, an adjusted PI-NNM was applied to the actual concrete production; the results showed a high prediction capability for the 28-day concrete strength.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: concrete mix design; concrete strength prediction; neural network training; prior information; prior information-based neural network model
Index terms: mix design, strength prediction, neural network, sand, aggregate, bias, admixture
Subjects: probability and distributions, structural engineering, artificial intelligence, materials science, building materials, concrete and cementitious materials
Topics: Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here