Optimized mobile crane path planning in discretized polar space

Mousaei, A; Taghaddos, H; Nekouvaght Tak, A; Behzadipour, S and Hermann, U (2021) Optimized mobile crane path planning in discretized polar space. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5): 04021036, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Improper planning and management of heavy lifts is a major cause of cost overruns, delays, and, more importantly, safety incidents in industrial megaprojects. Automated lift planning is widely acknowledged as an effective solution. This research presents an automated lift path planning system for mobile cranes leveraging space discretization and an obstacle-avoidance technique from robotics. The proposed method treats the lifted object as a three-degree-of-freedom convex traveling through the surrounding environment [a given two-dimensional (2D) elevation] with discretized rotational and translational motions in polar coordinates. It efficiently finds the best feasible pick location and optimized collision-free lift path in the polar coordinate system to the set location. This system is a state-of-the art advancement in crane path planning because it mimics the crane's intrinsic behavior and generates paths considering cost functions for safety, practicality, and economic objectives to enable its implementation in real practice settings. Illustrative examples are presented to verify the proposed approach and demonstrate its superiority over past similar path planning systems in terms of optimality and operational ease.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: automation; lift planning; mobile crane; modular construction; path planning; robotics in construction
Index terms: megaproject, modular construction, cost overrun, implementation, automation, robotics
Subjects: contractual arrangements, financial and cost management, strategic project management, automation and robotics, building construction
Topics: Procurement, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Project Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here