Investigation into explainable regression trees for construction engineering applications

Naumets, S and Lu, M (2021) Investigation into explainable regression trees for construction engineering applications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(8), ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The logic of an artificial intelligence (AI) model derived from machine learning algorithms and domain-specific data is analogous to an expert's perception of a complex problem. Human insight based on know-how and experience also provides the best clue to verify such analytical models generalized from data. To facilitate the acceptance and implementation of AI by industry professionals, we explored the least complicated form of model that still is sufficient to represent the complexities of real-world problems. This research established a framework to apply the M5P model tree in the context of producing explainable AI for practical applications. The explanatory information derived from M5P (a decision tree with linear regressions at leaf nodes) is instrumental in explaining how the more complicated AI model reasons for the same problem, illuminating the sufficiency of problem definition and data quality, and distinguishing valid submodels from invalid ones in the obtained model tree. A steel fabrication labor cost-estimating case and a concrete strength development case were given for method validation and application demonstration.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: implementation, artificial intelligence, fabrication, construction engineering, labour cost, investigation, decision tree, analytical model, machine learning, estimating, complexity, validation
Subjects: decision analysis, systems engineering, cost management, theoretical framing, manufacturing engineering, engineering methods, professional development, contractual arrangements, artificial intelligence, financial and cost management, data collection methods
Topics: Digital Applications, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management, Procurement, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here