Burcar, I and Radujkovic, M (2005) Risk registers in construction in Croatia. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2005, London, UK.
Abstract
Based on overall research results and the current situation in practice, it is clear that risk management practice in the Croatian construction industry is at quite a low level. In order to improve it, a risk register needs to be implemented in regular construction company business. The main research results on risk in construction are presented, as well as the current role of the risk register; its form and its prevalence in the Croatian construction industry. The study is set in the context of the current Croatian approach and problems compared with the situation in the world. Suggestions are given for the development and implementation of the risk register in the Croatian construction industry, presented with model of a Risk register system.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction industry; development; risk management; risk register; structure |
| Index terms: | risk management, implementation, construction industry, low level, Croatia, construction company, risk register |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, risk assessment, organization, measurement and scaling, industry analysis, Geography, financial risk |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Business Strategy, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Risk Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here