O'Connor, J T and Koo, H J (2021) Proactive design quality assessment tool for building projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(2): 04020174, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Building projects have become increasingly complex in recent decades for various reasons, including continuously improving technology, ongoing demand for more sophisticated design, and larger numbers of project stakeholders. Consequently, project teams find it increasingly difficult to attain design quality without errors or omissions. To provide a proactive approach to design quality management of building projects, this study focused on developing a design quality assessment tool based on the contributing causal factors and impacts of high-priority design defects. To this end, the authors first conducted interviews with 66 industry professionals to identify the contributing causal factors and impacts of quality-problematic design defects. Based on the results of these interviews, the authors generated 160 leading indicator questions to incorporate into their design quality assessment tool. The developed implementation tool enables practitioners to assess project design quality and prevent undesirable risks in a timely manner. This study deepens understanding of building design defects and supports design quality improvement through an effective design quality assessment tool.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building design quality; design defect leading indicators; design quality assessment tool; design quality management |
| Index terms: | project team, project stakeholder, project design, practitioner, building design, design defect, implementation, design quality, interview |
| Subjects: | practitioner, sociology, professional practice, architectural design, contractual arrangements, data collection methods, project delivery |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here