Castell, L (2005) Empowering the client in the briefing process. In: Khosrowshahi, F (ed.) Proceedings of 21st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2005, London, UK.
Abstract
Accurately identifying the client's requirements is essential for project success. They form part of the project charter and ultimately determine the project scope. However, in the construction industry the process of identifying client requirements, called client briefing, has not been particularly successful. In seeking a solution for the construction industry, Barrett and Stanley (1999) suggest empowering the client is one of the main areas for improving the briefing process. The aim of this paper is to assess both the current level of client empowerment in the briefing process and the extent to which project managers are assisting their clients to be more empowered. Literature from the areas of construction, health and general management has been reviewed to establish a list of empowering qualities and a survey undertaken of project managers to obtain their rating of client empowerment and levels of assistance being offered. Findings of the survey indicate that levels of client empowerment are low particularly in understanding the need for and setting project objectives, assertiveness and confidence and in understanding roles and responsibility in briefing. Whilst project managers are clearly offering assistance to their clients, the generally low level of client empowerment may be a significant contributor to the lack of success in client briefing.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | client briefing; empowerment; project success |
| Index terms: | client requirements, project scope, briefing, construction industry, low level, project success, project manager, empowerment, survey |
| Subjects: | scope management, data collection methods, profession, professional development, project management theory and practice, management, industry analysis, measurement and scaling |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management, Information Management, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here