Pirzadeh, P; Lingard, H and Blismas, N (2021) Design decisions and interactions: A sociotechnical network perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(10): 04021110, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Effective interaction between project participants is essential in achieving a high-quality design. Through interaction, information is disseminated in project teams and the required knowledge becomes accessible during decision-making episodes. Consequently, effective interaction contributes to improved design outcomes and enhanced project efficiency leading to a higher chance of project success. Although interactions have been studied in the past, such studies predominantly focused on interaction patterns only, thus ignoring the decision-making context, participants' involvement, and the interdependencies between decisions. This paper makes a methodological contribution to the body of knowledge by proposing a sociotechnical framework. The framework enables the simultaneous investigation of decision interdependencies, the patterns of social interactions that address design knowledge requirements, and participants' involvement in and influence on making decisions. To demonstrate its efficacy, the framework was applied in a case study. The evidence suggests that design decisions with positive constructability outcomes could be achieved through an alignment between the information interdependencies of design decisions and the interaction patterns that underpin them. Involvement of participants with relevant knowledge and expertise and collaborative information exchanges between participants facilitated this alignment. The framework can be used in different project settings to analyze the theoretical mechanisms that characterize effective interaction in the context of design decision-making.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | effective interaction; exponential random graph models; integrated design decision-making; multilevel network; sociotechnical framework |
| Index terms: | design decision, body of knowledge, evidence, decision-making, information exchange, project team, social interaction, interaction, constructability, investigation, graph model, project success, case study, efficiency |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, mathematical modelling, knowledge management, data science, project delivery, project management theory and practice, design practice, performance management, construction integration, behavioral psychology, sociology, decision analysis |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here