Pushpakumara, B H J and Thusitha, G A (2021) Development of a structural health monitoring tool for underwater concrete structures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(10): 04021135, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Limited studies have gathered information on structural health monitoring (SHM) of underwater structures, and most of those studies are outdated. The existing methods evaluated structural distresses separately, without accounting for the correlation between the distresses. This study developed a SHM tool which accounts for the reciprocal relationships and priority weights of different structural distresses, and assessed underwater structures using the developed structural health monitoring tool. A new rating method was developed using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) which incorporates visual inspections of surface distresses, nondestructive tests (NDTs), crack details, hydraulic conditions, and casual characteristics of the underwater structures. The SHM tool was applied to 12 underwater structures, including bridges, dams, canals, water tanks and quay walls. The results of NDTs such as rebound hammer tests and ultrasonic pulse velocity tests, crack surveys, and visual observations on underwater concrete structures are employed in the SHM tool and the structures were rated using priority weights allocated to different attributes. The SHM tool developed in this study supports enhanced efficiency and effectiveness of structural health monitoring of underwater structures and proposes a numerical framework which can be employed to rate and compare the structural health of different underwater concrete structures.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | concrete; condition assessment; marine growth; nondestructive tests; priority weights |
| Index terms: | accounting, visual inspection, survey, canal, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, concrete structure, hydraulic, effectiveness, monitoring, distress, efficiency |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, control systems, fluid mechanics, economic analysis, professional practice, performance management, structural engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here