Radujković, M; Sjekavica Klepo, M and Bosch-Rekveldt, M (2021) Breakdown of engineering projects' success criteria. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11): 04021144, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents the findings from a study of the breakdown of project success criteria. An exploration of the evolution of studies on the success of engineering projects over decades was the basis for a project success definition proposal. Using a comprehensive literature review of success criteria for engineering projects, a list of 133 different success criteria was identified. Those criteria were analyzed to develop an integrated framework of project success criteria, describing its hierarchical decomposition. Such a breakdown structure could serve as a starting point when setting project success criteria for a specific project, because the importance of criteria will be context dependent. Practitioners or stakeholders could discuss and tailor it based on specific features of engineering projects or specific needs and interests. Generally, criteria have evolved from simple work-related factors to focusing more on the complex benefits of the projects. Such an evolving success definition has implications for further studies of project success and might contribute toward a long-term vision in which all projects will be delivered successfully.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | breakdown; engineering projects; success; success criteria |
| Index terms: | project success, exploration, evolution, practitioner, literature review, proposal, success criteria |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, project planning, environmental science, environmental resource management, practitioner, assessment methods, project management theory and practice |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here