Sadeh, H; Mirarchi, C and Pavan, A (2021) Integrated approach to construction risk management: Cost implications. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(10), ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Managing risk in construction projects has proven to be a challenge for many project managers and stakeholders involved in projects. The lack of a systematic approach and standardized processes are key factors influencing improper risk management techniques. This research introduces a new model to evaluate and assess risk in terms of cost impact, utilizing a fuzzy Monte Carlo simulation approach for the first time. The method consists of ranking the top risks using a fuzzy logic system utilized in an objective manner by setting criteria for experts to rank the risk based on cost impact and probability to reduce human biases, then evaluating their cost impact through a Monte Carlo simulation both pre- and postmitigation. This work proposes a new strategy to elicit risk for construction projects based on risk cost impact, project type, project location, project contract type, and project delivery method. Based on the findings, implementation of a risk mitigation response plan can decrease the project cost remarkably. This model proved to be beneficial in forecasting risk impact when executed on a commercial construction project in California. This model can be applied as a general tool for risk mitigation processes for the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction cost; digitalization; fuzzy logic; Monte Carlo simulation; project management; risk management |
| Index terms: | risk management, project delivery, project management, implementation, construction industry, project manager, fuzzy logic, forecasting, commercial construction, Monte Carlo simulation, construction cost, bias, construction project, risk mitigation, digitalization, integrated approach, project cost, risk impact, strategy |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, industry analysis, economics, management, probability and distributions, financial risk, project management theory and practice, production management, modelling and simulation, digital technology, financial and cost management, project delivery, prediction and forecasting, data science, contractual arrangements, profession, risk assessment, construction type |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Risk Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here