Benefits realization: Novel conceptual model for front end-design decision-making using dempster-shafer theory and quality function deployment

Serugga, J; Kagioglou, M and Tzortzopoulos, P (2021) Benefits realization: Novel conceptual model for front end-design decision-making using dempster-shafer theory and quality function deployment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7): 04021062, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper proposes a new conceptual approach to address the gap in the understanding of benefits realization, which is an increasingly central element in the delivery of successful projects in architecture, engineering, and construction (AEC) design. The paper focuses on the link between uncertainty in front-end design (FED) and the delivery of project benefits as understood in the broader benefits realization theory. The paper builds on the nature of uncertainty and use of Dempster-Shafer theoretic and quality function deployment to model the various interdependences among design attributes. A social housing case study of Brazil's Mia Casa, Mia Vida Program demonstrated the application of the modeling approach. Optimal belief and plausibility structures in design decision-making were observed to increase with increasing consideration of more use models. These findings demonstrate that modeling uncertainty in FED can contribute to improved design decision-making. The paper's novel contribution is introducing uncertainty modeling to support design decision-making to overcome insufficiencies in the inherently rational design decision-making that often is unable to discern complexities in dynamic project contexts.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: benefits realization uncertainty modeling; front-end design
Index terms: program, design decision, complexity, uncertainty modelling, benefits realization, Brazil, interdependence, quality function deployment, modelling, social housing, case study
Subjects: analytical methods, data collection methods, value management, housing and residential development, organizational analysis, environmental hazards, quality assurance, systems engineering, software systems, design practice, Geography
Topics: Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Quality Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here