Critical analysis of the private sector roles in water PPP failures

Tariq, S and Zhang, X (2021) Critical analysis of the private sector roles in water PPP failures. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4): 04021015, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Public-private partnerships (PPPs) have seen continuous growth in water infrastructure and services over the last few decades due to budgetary and technological constraints of the public sector and the requirements for efficiency improvements. However, many water PPPs have failed in both developed and developing countries. In some cases, the government has to pay huge compensations for contract terminations, and in others, the private party withdrew or even became bankrupt because of extreme financial loss. Despite the disastrous consequences, research on water PPP failures is scarce. This paper attempts to unveil the factors associated with the private sector that have led to the failure of water PPPs and their causal relationships. Through an exploratory sequential mixed-method research approach that integrates literature review, multiple case studies, questionnaire survey, and statistical analysis, this paper has identified the common failure drivers initiated by the private sector, evaluated the relative severity of the failure drivers, and established the failure mechanism model for water PPPs in general. Outputs of this study will facilitate public and private sectors in better planning and managing water PPP projects and developing more responsive strategies to address the failure drivers that can occur in the different stages of the PPP life cycle toward successful outcomes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: failure drivers; failure mechanism; infrastructure; public-private partnership; water services
Index terms: efficiency, case study, life cycle, partnership, private sector, statistical analysis, public sector, compensation, developing country, contract termination, strategy, literature review, survey, questionnaire
Subjects: partnership management, industry analysis, administrative law, management, performance management, contract management, development economics, data analysis and analytics, data science, data collection methods, dispute resolution, value management
Topics: Legal Issues, International Construction, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here