Wang, S; Zhu, S and Yuen, P L (2021) Assessment of ground-borne vibration impact on nearby underground facilities induced by ground surface excavation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7): 04021071, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Hydraulic breakers are used widely in construction activities such as rock excavation, building demolition, and pavement crushing. High-level ground-borne vibrations generated by hydraulic breakers may adversely affect the surrounding environment and nearby underground facilities. Therefore, vibration impact assessment based on the estimation of vibration intensities on and below ground surface should be conducted before the commencement of any ground excavation work in foundation construction. However, existing empirical formulas are intended mainly for describing ground surface vibrations, and cannot accurately predict underground vibrations. This study quantified the vibration propagation characteristics and the corresponding vibration impact on underground facilities through systematic finite-element simulations of hydraulic breaker-induced ground waves for the first time. A new empirical formula is proposed to estimate the surface and underground vibration intensities, and its efficacy was verified on the basis of field measurement data. The proposed empirical formula enables the direct assessment of vibration impact on buried facilities. Safe separation distances and vibration monitoring limits can be derived to protect underground facilities against vibration-induced damage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction-induced ground-borne vibrations; ground excavation; hydraulic breakers; safe separation distances; underground facilities; vibration impact assessment; vibration limits |
| Index terms: | construction activity, vibration, monitoring, field-measurement, estimation, impact assessment, propagation, excavation, estimate, hydraulic |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, value management, control systems, mechanical systems, construction operations, engineering process, financial and cost management, fluid mechanics |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Site Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here