Wang, Z; Liu, Y; Hu, H and Dai, L (2021) Hybrid rescheduling optimization model under disruptions in precast production considering real-world environment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(4): 04021012, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Increased emphasis is currently placed on precast production scheduling due to the upward-trending applications of precast technology. However, existing studies primarily focused on static scheduling, and few of them addressed dynamic rescheduling problems subject to disruptions from individual products without considering constraints in the practical environment. In this paper, a hybrid rescheduling optimization model for precast production is proposed to minimize rescheduling costs and ensure on-time delivery under disruptions of machine breakdown. The rescheduling was first optimized based on the genetic algorithm considering the idle time of multiple production lines, time intervals, and operation characteristics in precast production. Subsequently, the feasibility of potential reschedules was further verified via simulating production uncertainties in a real-world environment to achieve a trade-off between a high service level and profit maximization. Finally, a case study with different realistic scenarios was conducted to prove the superiority of the model in comparison with other methods. This methodology will increase the applicability of rescheduling methods in practice and reduce production costs of components in precast construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | breakdown; optimization; production; resilience; scheduling; simulation |
| Index terms: | case study, methodology, scheduling, genetic algorithm, production cost, maximization, profit |
| Subjects: | manufacturing engineering, research methods, algorithms, economic analysis, operations research, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Time Control, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here