Perceptions of construction work: Views to consider to improve employee recruitment and retention

Welfare, K; Sherratt, F and Hallowell, M (2021) Perceptions of construction work: Views to consider to improve employee recruitment and retention. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(7): 04021053, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

With increasing demands for new infrastructure and a decreased availability of skilled construction craft workers, the need to recruit and retain workers is becoming critical. It is important to understand the preferences of workers and, consequentially, ensure that positive attributes of the job are preserved and negative attributes are mitigated in practice. To better understand the preferences of construction workers, 222 interviews were conducted with workers on active commercial construction sites in Colorado. Workers were asked simple, open-ended questions about their jobs and work preferences using a social constructionist approach. The results indicate that workers most enjoy seeing tangible results, social interaction with coworkers, problem-solving, challenging and diverse work tasks, and working with their hands. Conversely, negative attributes were work pressure, indirect communication, mandates from upper management, dangerous work, and a feeling of indifference perceived by their coworkers. These results improve understandings of the fundamental reasons why construction workers are attracted to their profession.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: preference, mandate, interview, social interaction, recruitment, construction worker, construction work, profession, commercial construction, retention, becoming
Subjects: operations management, practitioner, institututions, construction type, data collection methods, philosophical process, political science, sociology, management, decision-making and reasoning
Topics: Human Resources, Governance, Construction Technology, Roles and Professions, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here