Yevu, S K; Yu, A T W; Darko, A and Addy, M N (2021) Evaluation model for influences of driving forces for electronic procurement systems application in Ghanaian construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(8): 04021076, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Recent recognition for increased digitization of construction processes presents an important need to accelerate electronic procurement systems (EPS) application on projects. The EPS uptake rate in construction is relatively low, and the decision process required to increase the uptake is complex due to the influences of several competing driving forces (DFs). Previous studies identified individual DFs based on experts' qualitative judgements and knowledge, which are subjective and lack the inherent clustering influences of DFs on EPS application. This study developed a fuzzy-based evaluation model for assessing DFs influences on EPS application in construction projects. The model transforms qualitative judgments into quantitative and more-usable assessments using fuzzy sets for effective long-term planning and consistent implementation decisions. A data set of 121 expert responses, resulting in 6 clusters of DFs, was applied to fuzzy logic to develop the DFs influence evaluation model. The integrity and environment-related forces and process optimization-related forces were the top two DFs clusters influencing EPS uptake. The remaining four clusters had significant influences, resulting in an overall high influence threshold. This implies that significant influence levels of the DFs clusters are required to accelerate EPS uptake on projects. This study contributes to knowledge by developing an influence model integrating subjective expressions to indicate EPS uptake within a project's environment. The model's flexibility helps to assess influences based on a decision maker's situation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; driving forces; electronic procurement; fuzzy sets; information systems |
| Index terms: | integrity, construction process, clustering, electronic procurement, information system, fuzzy set, decision process, judgment, fuzzy logic, implementation, construction project |
| Subjects: | dispute resolution, building construction, decision analysis, contractual arrangements, information systems, health safety and environment, production management, data science, decision-making and optimization |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Site Management, Project Management, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Procurement, Research Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here