Key variables in determining energy shaving capacity of buildings during demand response events

Yu, X and Ergan, S (2021) Key variables in determining energy shaving capacity of buildings during demand response events. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(1): 04020146, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

In the US, the increasing electricity demand lays massive pressure on national grids. Demand response (DR) programs provide an economical way to avoid electrical blackouts by incentivizing end-consumers to reduce their demand during peak hours and emergencies. However, the estimation of the power demand shaving capacity (PSC) (i.e., the amount of power demand that can be curtailed) of buildings is often inaccurate in the current practice because it only relies on oversimplified building design specifications. Moreover, existing estimation models of PSC either require detailed information (e.g., thermal resistance value) that are not readily available and hard to acquire, or that are building/system-specific and hard to scale up. In this study, the authors implemented the state-of-the-art feature explanation approach to identify key variables by evaluating the contribution of all related variables extracted from previous DR research efforts and current practices of DR programs. By identifying key variables, the authors attempted to find the sweet spot of PSC estimation models that can ensure accuracy, generality, and scalability. The proposed data-driven PSC estimation model using only key variables (47% reduction from all identified information items) and trained using 28 different buildings showed 81% better performance as compared with the benchmark of the current practice.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: program, state of the art, specification, electricity demand, building design, demand response, estimation, accuracy, thermal resistance
Subjects: research dissemination and communication, contractual condition, architectural design, material properties and characteristics, energy systems, software systems, financial and cost management, professional development
Topics: Sustainability, Information Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Construction Materials, Digital Applications, Contract Administration, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here