Parameterized design optimization framework for worker-friendly workplaces in modular construction

Zaalouk, A and Han, S (2021) Parameterized design optimization framework for worker-friendly workplaces in modular construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(5): 04021030, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Addressing ergonomic risk factors in modular construction is critical to enhancing the productivity of production lines and reducing the societal cost burden for worker recovery. Ergonomics-driven workplace design is thus essential to not only proactively reducing risks through design changes but also accommodating medical restrictions for workers returning to work after an injury or illness. However, efforts to realize this two-fold approach are confounded by the lack of a sound approach to identifying the root causes of ergonomic posture risks among various workplace design parameters or an optimal workplace design for multiple tasks. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a parameterized workplace design optimization framework that consists of four core components: workplace design initiation, interactive worker-workplace simulation, development of predictive surrogate models, and workplace optimization. The framework is demonstrated through a case study designing a drywall preparation workplace in a real modular construction plant. The results show that the framework enables the design of the optimal workplace (i.e., the one with minimal ergonomic risk) and provides a guide for devising practical action plans for safety improvement.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: definitive screening design; ergonomic posture assessment; interactive worker-workplace simulation; modular construction; optimal workplace design
Index terms: risk factor, productivity, illness, screening, recovery, case study, design optimization, ergonomics, modular construction, workplace design, design change, injury
Subjects: data collection methods, contractual arrangements, operations management, design process, design practice, management, environmental hazards, occupational health and safety management, building construction, health conditions and diseases
Topics: Design Practice, Human Resources, Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Business Strategy, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here