Axiology-based valuation modeling for human-centered decision making in building planning and design

Zhang, L and El-Gohary, N M (2021) Axiology-based valuation modeling for human-centered decision making in building planning and design. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11): 04021138, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Understanding and assessing the value of building systems to stakeholders and the impacts of decision making on this value has become a national imperative. However, there is still a lack of understanding and formalized modeling of what different stakeholders value (e.g., energy conservation, safety, economic growth) in buildings and how to valuate (i.e., quantify the worth) buildings based on these values. This paper proposes an axiology-based valuation modeling approach. Axiology is a theory of value (worth) that explores questions such as what are the objects that we value and how to measure their value. The paper focuses on presenting an axiology-based mathematical value quantification and aggregation model for quantifying the worth of a building object based on object properties and stakeholder values. The proposed model is theoretically grounded in formal axiology. It builds on two key notions in Hartman's formal axiology. First, object valuation depends on its properties. Second, valuation has systemic, extrinsic, and intrinsic dimensions. The model was validated through predictive validation, which measures the correlation between actual stakeholder rankings of valuated objects and model-predicted rankings. The results of the validation show that there is a very strong and significant positive correlation between the two types of rankings, which indicates that the proposed valuation model is valid. The proposed model contributes to the body of knowledge by offering a way to assess the value of building objects based on stakeholder values; it could facilitate value-sensitive decision making by embodying stakeholder values in project planning and design toward better synergy between human values and the built environment.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: aggregation; axiology; human values; infrastructure management; quantification; stakeholder; value analysis
Index terms: quantification, infrastructure management, building system, built environment, modelling, economic growth, dimension, energy conservation, synergy, human values, value analysis, decision-making, stakeholder value, validation, body of knowledge, project planning
Subjects: health monitoring assessment and metrics, analytical methods, energy systems, knowledge management, participation process, control systems, health behaviours and lifestyles, engineering systems, decision analysis, measurement and scaling, partnership management, financial analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, economic development, infrastructure engineering, professional development
Topics: Engineering Principles, Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Cost Management, Sustainability, Stakeholder Management, Risk Management, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here