Zhang, Y; Chen, Y; Wang, Y and Li, H (2021) Dual-attribution model of trust development between contracting parties in construction projects: Psychological perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 147(11): 04021161, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The importance of understanding individuals' psychology when studying interorganizational trust has been increasingly acknowledged by researchers in the construction industry. However, few studies have purposely examined the individual's psychological process in trust development between contracting parties. This research investigated how individuals make inferences about the counterparty's trustworthiness from the party's cooperative behaviors. A dual-attribution model of trust development was developed based on the attribution theory and the dual-process theory. Seven hypotheses were proposed and tested. Data collected from 310 practitioners through a questionnaire survey were analyzed with hierarchical multiple regression and Sobel Test. The results suggest that the counterparty's relational behaviors - which are cooperative behaviors outside of contractual enforcement - will trigger individuals' dispositional attribution, resulting in positive expectations for their counterparty's trustworthiness. Reduced conflict perception and aroused affection contribute to the attribution process, analytically and intuitively. Both the theoretical model and the empirical evidence will provide support for contracting parties to develop relational trust in construction projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | affection; conflict; dual attribution process; interorganizational trust; relational behaviors; trust expectation |
| Index terms: | interorganizational, construction industry, survey, multiple-regression, psychology, enforcement, questionnaire, practitioner, attribution theory, evidence, trust development, contracting party, construction project, cooperative behaviour, relational trust |
| Subjects: | behavioral psychology, industry analysis, production management, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, statistical analysis, psychology, data collection methods, business, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Project Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Human Resources, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here