Creation of a mock-up bridge digital twin by fusing intelligent transportation systems (ITS) data into bridge information model (brim)

Adibfar, A and Costin, A M (2022) Creation of a mock-up bridge digital twin by fusing intelligent transportation systems (ITS) data into bridge information model (brim). Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(9): 04022094, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Passage of overweighted commercial vehicles is one of the significant causes of damage to the pavement and structural components of bridges. Weigh-in-motion (WIM) systems can currently detect real-time traffic data; however, these data are stored in standalone databases. Building information modeling (BIM) has transformed the construction industry by injecting "information"into the building model and integrating different databases. BIM capabilities for bilateral exchange of data led to the inception of digital twin. This research investigates the feasibility of developing a digital twin of a mock-up bridge by integrating WIM data into a bridge information model (BrIM). The system was validated by first creating a mock-up bridge with affixed weight sensors attached to microcomputers and then developing a BrIM model and passing scaled vehicles over in real time with varying weight capacities. This study showed the feasibility of creating digital twins, ultimately enabling future research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: bridge; case study; digital twin; infrastructure; internet of things
Index terms: digital twin, building information modelling, case study, database, real time, construction industry, internet
Subjects: industry analysis, information systems, data management, project controls, computing systems, data collection methods, digital engineering
Topics: Digital Applications, Time Control, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here