Asghari, V and Hsu, S C (2022) Upscaling complex project-level infrastructure intervention planning to network assets. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(1): 04021188, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Probabilistic and nonlinear models have been used to accurately model various phenomena in asset management systems (AMS). With a commonly adopted framework using Monte Carlo simulation and heuristic algorithms, AMS proposed in the literature aim to maintain the functionality of assets in their life-cycle by optimally allocating limited resources to different intervention actions. However, due to their high computational costs, upscaling complex project-level AMS to a multitude of assets currently is far from practical. To address this gap between the literature and the practice of project-level AMS, this paper presents a new machine learning-based methodology to estimate (near-)optimal intervention timings which usually are derived by optimization algorithms. To illustrate, an ensemble of random forests models was trained on optimal maintenance timings of more than 1.6 million semisynthesized bridges. The trained model yielded optimized maintenance, rehabilitation, and reconstruction (MRR) plans with greater than 95% accuracy on the test set and greater than 89% accuracy on more than 4,600 highway bridges in Indiana, and did so 6 orders of magnitude faster than the conventional framework of complex MRR optimization. Practitioners can adopt the proposed methodology to enhance their decision-making systems, obtain optimal maintenance plans without sacrificing complex and accurate models, and take another step toward sustainability objectives.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | asset management; bridge management; maintenance optimization; Monte Carlo simulation; random forests |
| Index terms: | optimization algorithm, decision-making, methodology, practitioner, machine learning, forest, functionality, asset management, accuracy, complex project, estimate, reconstruction, heuristic, Monte Carlo simulation |
| Subjects: | design features, modelling and simulation, environmental science, artificial intelligence, strategic project management, financial and cost management, risk assessment, practitioner, asset management, decision analysis, building construction, research methods, algorithms, professional development |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Design Practice, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here