Process waste analysis for offsite production methods for house construction: A case study of factory wall panel production

Ayinla, K; Cheung, F and Skitmore, M (2022) Process waste analysis for offsite production methods for house construction: A case study of factory wall panel production. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(1): 05021011, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

There is growing interest in the use of offsite manufacturing (OSM) in the construction industry despite criticism that some offsite approaches used by housebuilders do not offer real improvement compared with their onsite counterparts. Quantitative performance measures from previous studies are based on conventional onsite methods, with little attention paid to the performance and process improvements derived from various OSM methods. In response, a case study was conducted based on two OSM methods using standardized and nonstandardized processes for the production stage of a factory-manufactured wall panel. Value system analysis and root cause analysis using the 5Whys method was adopted to evaluate possible improvements in terms of process waste. The study reveals that OSM production methods that replicate site arrangements and activities involving significant manual tasks do not necessarily provide a marked improvement over the conventional onsite method. Thus, there is a need to reevaluate the processes involved to eliminate such embedded process wastes as non-value-added time and cost, and to consider automating critical activities. The analysis adopted in this case study provides measurable evidence of the performance gained from having a structured workflow over a nonstructured workflow. It also reveals how process wastes are generated in the production process of wall panels offsite.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 5whys; lean manufacturing; offsite manufacturing; process modeling; process waste; root cause analysis
Index terms: construction industry, housebuilder, onsite, case study, workflow, house construction, process waste, root cause analysis, lean manufacturing, evidence, performance measure, production process, process improvement, process modelling
Subjects: building construction, industry analysis, management, manufacturing engineering, performance measurement, design analysis, evaluation and assessment methods, data collection methods, construction type, risk assessment, practitioner, waste management
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Design Practice, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here