Bai, S; Li, M; Lu, Q; Tian, H and Qin, L (2022) Global time optimization method for dredging construction cycles of trailing suction hopper dredger based on grey system model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(2): 04021198, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The efficient operation of trailing suction hopper dredgers can reduce equipment operation time and energy consumption, accelerate overall construction, reduce workload and material resource usage, and lower construction costs. Based on an in-depth analysis of the dredging construction optimization problem, the overflow loss prediction and a loading cycle optimization method based on the loaded earth curve are proposed in this study. The loading cycle optimization method is divided into three stages. In the first stage, statistical learning and machine learning methods are used to predict and analyze the loaded earth data by describing the time scale of the loaded earth data, and the grey system prediction model was selected for the subsequent developments. In the second stage, by analyzing the loaded earth curve prediction model, the concept of overflow loss rate and its predictive calculation method is proposed. In the third stage, combined with the loaded earth curve prediction model, a global time geometric coordinate optimization model of the loading cycle is proposed to avoid the power and time waste caused by excessive overflow loss. A channel dredging project in Tianjin Port was taken as an application example to verify the applicability of the proposed optimization method and optimize the construction work efficiency.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | global time optimization; grey system model; loaded earth curve; overflow loss; trailing suction hopper dredger |
| Index terms: | overflow, construction work, construction cost, efficiency, loading, energy consumption, machine learning, workload, prediction model, dredging |
| Subjects: | fluid mechanics, performance management, financial and cost management, energy systems, operations management, artificial intelligence, management, construction operations, water management, prediction and forecasting |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Site Management, Human Resources, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Quality Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here