Candaş, A B and Tokdemir, O B (2022) Automating coordination efforts for reviewing construction contracts with multilabel text classification. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(6): 04022027, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction projects involve multiple company departments and disciplines. The departments follow certain rules in implementing a project, also referred to as requirements in a construction contract. Current administration practices do not show which discipline or department is related to any requirement in the contracts. Thus, all departments need to review contract requirements but typically only from their perspective and with minimal communication with one another. In addition to the tendency of this manual process to error, time and money are lost in evaluating irrelevant departmental requirements. This study concentrates on one aspect of contract interpretation, coordination of the contract requirement review. Automating a classification of the contract requirements by relevant departments can increase the efficiency of contract reviews. This study proposes a robust approach to automating contract sentence classification by relevance to the company department. The approach comprises both natural language processing (NLP) and supervised machine learning techniques to train an algorithm. Training data are selected from an internationally and widely used standard form of construction contract. Precision metric results as high as 0.952 and recall metric results as high as 0.786 are acquired by support vector classifiers (SVCs). These are considered sufficient within the context of multilabel classification of construction contract sentences for construction professionals to operate without further training. The developed methodology reduces time spent on contract review, reliably and accurately predicts classification of contract sentences for departmental relevance, and also removes the dependence on expert participation in coordination efforts contract review.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction contracts; contract administration; machine learning; metrics; multilabel classification; natural language processing |
| Index terms: | machine learning, methodology, construction project, efficiency, contract administration, coordination, construction contract, construction professional |
| Subjects: | artificial intelligence, contract type, professional development, contract management, production management, research methods, performance management, management |
| Topics: | Information Management, Project Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Organizational Design, Contract Administration |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here