Multiobjective robust optimization model for generating stable and makespan-protective repetitive schedules

Cao, Q; Zou, X and Zhang, L (2022) Multiobjective robust optimization model for generating stable and makespan-protective repetitive schedules. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(9): 04022099, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction projects often face various uncertainties during their execution. Even if planned project schedules are optimal with respect to time or cost, their implementation may be affected by these uncertainties, resulting in project delays, cost overruns, or both. To address this challenge, this study presents a multiobjective robust optimization model for scheduling repetitive projects under the line-of-balance (LOB) framework, with the objective of minimizing the project cost while maximizing the schedule robustness without exceeding a given deadline. The ability of an LOB schedule to protect against unexpected events caused by various uncertainties was quantified using a new robustness measure. The proposed model was then extended to consider the constraints of available cash with the objective of devising financially feasible and stable schedules. The practicability of the proposed robust optimization model and the effectiveness of the robustness measure were verified by a highway project. The results show that the model can construct the optimal trade-off curve between project cost and schedule robustness, of which the most suitable schedule can be determined once additional information about the level of uncertainty and its impact are provided.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: cash flow; critical activities; line-of-balance scheduling; robust optimization; robustness measure
Index terms: cash flow, scheduling, face, project cost, construction project, project delay, repetitive project, cost overrun, highway construction, effectiveness, implementation
Subjects: performance management, civil engineering, economics, financial management, production management, project controls, operations research, psychology, financial and cost management, contractual arrangements
Topics: Cost Management, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Quality Management, Time Control, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here