Feng, K; Wang, S; Lu, W; Liu, C and Wang, Y (2022) Planning construction projects in deep uncertainty: A data-driven uncertainty analysis approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(8): 04022060, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction planning is significantly affected by many uncertain factors derived from construction tasks, the environments, resources, technologies, personnel, and more. Uncertainty analysis approaches are thus critical to supporting the decision making associated with construction planning. However, the precise probability distributions (PDs) of uncertain factors are sometimes inaccessible, especially for construction projects in a novel context with limited previous experiences or similar references. These situations constitute a deep uncertainty problem, and probability-based methods are no longer applicable for construction planning. To address this challenge, an uncertainty analysis approach that integrates Latin hypercube sampling (LHS), discrete-event simulation (DES), and the patient rule induction method (PRIM) is proposed. Specifically, it is progressed by LHS and DES to generate a wide array of uncertainty scenarios represented by possible PDs to quantify the robustness of various construction decisions; then, PRIM is used to identify the vulnerable scenarios that will jeopardize project completion. The approach was implemented on a real-world project, and the results demonstrated that it was able to identify the most robust construction schemes and vulnerable scenarios for construction planning. This research contributes a data-driven technology that provides an uncertainty analysis approach for construction planning without relying on assumed probability distributions from limited, unreliable project references.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction planning; decision making; deep uncertainty; robustness; vulnerability analysis |
| Index terms: | uncertainty analysis, probability distribution, sampling, decision-making, construction project, vulnerability, construction planning, personnel |
| Subjects: | production management, statistical analysis, construction planning, data collection methods, environmental hazards, decision analysis, management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Sustainability, Risk Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here