Franz, B and Roberts, B A M (2022) Thematic analysis of successful and unsuccessful project delivery teams in the building construction industry. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 148(3): 05022001, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Many critical success factors (CSFs) have been identified and tested over the years to aid resource-constrained project managers in delivering successful building construction projects. Human- or team-related success factors, in particular, have received more attention lately due to the benefits of effective collaboration among designers, contractors, and specialty trades. However, as a management tool, CSFs were never intended to be static. Recent technological and contracting advancements are changing the way that project delivery teams interact, and previously identified success factors may be less applicable to contemporary projects. The purpose of this research was to identify current team-related success factors through a thematic analysis of interviews conducted with project leaders on nine highly successful and seven highly unsuccessful projects, as defined by their cost and schedule performance. Specific examples from each interview were coded into 32 general statements. Commonalities in these statements were then developed using specific case contexts into nine subthemes and four overarching key themes. The key themes, which characterize success factors arising within the team, included: removing barriers to communication, developing a relational project culture, understanding the owner's role, and promoting autonomy. When compared to prior research, these results provide insight into how team-related success factors in the construction industry have evolved over time and establish a direction for building effective project delivery teams in the future. Specifically, these themes are more strategic than tactical, and focus on enabling teams to best leverage the competencies of individual members.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | case study; critical success factors; design-build; integrated project delivery; project delivery; qualitative |
| Index terms: | thematic analysis, collaboration, critical success factor, schedule performance, interview, success factor, building construction, integrated project delivery, project delivery, construction industry, case study, project manager, designer, owner |
| Subjects: | profession, data collection methods, control systems, contractual arrangements, health monitoring assessment and metrics, project delivery, management, methods and analysis, project controls, sociology, building construction, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Time Control, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here